Man killed by Tiger

Started by Mups, October 10, 2026, 10:09:54 PM

« previous - next »

Dextrous63

Yep Mups.  Assuming it's not "fake news", it suggests to me that he is way way beyond any spectrum I know of and is in the world of sociopathic abnormalities.  

I try to accept that everyone has a warped view of things at times and not use these occasional outliers to judge too deeply, but in this instance, it takes the entirety of McVities products!!

klondike

Sadly all too believable in his case.

Mups

I wonder how Trump would feel if it had been his own son,  and Andy Burnham posted the videos?

klondike

He probably isn't even smart enough to have it produced. He posted one of him in a plane dropping poop on some protesters which it somebody else had made and he liked it so reposted it from his account.


Trump reposts AI-generated video of plane dumping sludge on No Kings protesters | Donald Trump | The Guardian https://share.google/4FtBjl00WOShFeYOM

Mups

Quote from: klondike on October 14, 2026, 11:51:36 PMHe probably isn't even smart enough to have it produced. He posted one of him in a plane dropping poop on some protesters which it somebody else had made and he liked it so reposted it from his account.


Trump reposts AI-generated video of plane dumping sludge on No Kings protesters | Donald Trump | The Guardian https://share.google/4FtBjl00WOShFeYOM

This is what I was on about, Klondy.    This first article was on the news.


1) 


And -

2) 


Ashy

Why do they send a journalist to talk about social media standing outside a zoo which is closed? The news reader could just read it out.

muddy

It's a tragedy all around .
It's terribly sad that a man should die in this terrible way .
It will always be in the mind of his family .
Zoos ( who are in fact doing a good job for conservation of rare animals ) are no longer seen as family friendly .
This is the second such incident in recent months .
Zoo visitors must now be on guard from their fellow visitors and disturbed persons ( how does one know they are disturbed ? ) 
Keeping dangerous animals confined is always a risk .
They do what they do keeping the disturbed among our own species is more difficult .

klondike

Not keeping dangerous individuals confined is probably a bigger risk. Some of those animals would be extinct if it wasn't for zoos. Public admission is the only way they can be funded. Of course the natural way is to allow the extinctionds but we know the cause is us. Conservation is a guilt trip.

morty

I see the Health Authority are now investigating NHS employees who've been accessing the poor bloke's records.
Why do they do it? To sell on tasty news morsels to the newspapers?
It's pretty despicable.