Jason Arday.

Started by Diasi, Yesterday at 12:06:22 AM

« previous - next »

Diasi

This is one of the funniest Telegraph podcasts I've watched. Lol  :grin:

Make every day count, each day is precious.
"Death leaves a heartache no one can heal, love leaves a memory no one can steal".  (Cassandra)
[email protected]

Ashy

The corpse isn't cold yet. How stupid will they all look when he rises again.

klondike


muddy

I wonder how they feel about this now he is dead ?
Judging by the huge amount of people at his vigil which IMO it seems like mass hysteria .
People believe that journalists and the media are responsible for his suicide .

klondike

IMO there is only one person responsible for that suicide.

muddy

I am so troubled by this 
It would seem like some weird wokeness virus has infected most of the country .
What is right is now wrong and what is so very wrong is hailed as righteous .
Worse the word fascist is brought up to silence any argument .

I will quote Gad Saad here , himself an academic - a real one 

' It is astounding.  Imagine having a guy who was an utter academic fraud (including orgiastic plagiarism) and a narcissistic liar of the highest order (who made up countless stories about his life's story) being elevated to the status of a martyr because he was black.  This is what the cancer of the DIE (diversity, inclusion, and equity) cult looks like.  Yes, it is tragic that a man committed suicide but to blame it on "racism" is an insult to human causality and human reason.  He is solely to blame along with the degenerate progressive academics who enabled him to achieve such unearned academic status.  To try and demonize those who spoke out against his fraudulence is an attack on personal agency.' 

klondike


muddy

And from Richard Dawkins ( another academic ) 


" I am bewildered, and not very impressed, by the visceral, naked, irrational hatred spat out by some defenders of Jason Arday. If a Cambridge professor is accused of being an unqualified charlatan, the accusation might be racially motivated. On the other hand it might not, depending on the evidence. The correct question to ask is not, "What is the colour of his skin"  but "Is it in fact true that he is an unqualified charlatan?" Please examine the evidence before leaping to the assumption of racism.
As for the idea that journalists "piled in on him" and "hounded him to his death", most attacks were against Cambridge University. Jason himself was widely regarded as an unfortunate victim of  foolish promotion way beyond his ability to cope. In appointing him to  a professorship for which he was manifestly unqualified – in ludicrously describing him as "the best in the world" –  certain senior members of the university showed a level of patronising condescension towards black people that could fairly be described as racism, while at the same time making him tragically vulnerable to such attacks as came his way."