Facial recognition...

Started by Scrumpy, Today at 08:09:25 AM

« previous - next »

Scrumpy


Good... About bloody time... If you have nothing to hide you will have nothing to worry about..
Human rights .. Or whatever they are called will complain .. SHUT UP..

There are some nasty people out there.. doing some horrendous things ..
 Mind you.. All those 'baddies' look the same.. with a mask on..
Don't ask me.. I know nuffink..

klondike

I hope their AI is better that the stuff my son tried on some of his camera feeds...






JBR

I agree that facial recognition is likely to be advantageous in crime prevention, especially as I see so many people on the news who are wearing face masks to hide their identity.
Muslim women, of course, might be encouraged not to cover their faces.  That is an ancient religious requirement and I'm sure that many of them only do so following orders from their husband (or even father).
Numquam credere Gallicum

muddy

No flaming keyffiahs wrapped around their cowardly mugs .
Face coverings must be banned .
No question about it .

Dextrous63

Quote from: muddy on Today at 11:17:17 AMNo flaming keyffiahs wrapped around their cowardly mugs .
Face coverings must be banned .
No question about it .
I don't understand who they're trying to hide their ID from.  The authorities won't penalise them, and their fellow brethren won't be an issue.  You'd have thought they'd be proud to show themselves. 🤷🏻�♂️

JBR

Quote from: Dextrous63 on Today at 11:34:25 AMI don't understand who they're trying to hide their ID from.  The authorities won't penalise them, and their fellow brethren won't be an issue.  You'd have thought they'd be proud to show themselves. 🤷🏻�♂️
Orders from husbands: 'This is my possession and nobody will have the benefit of seeing it'.
Numquam credere Gallicum

Ashy

In my humble opinion.

There is nothing in the mohamedan religion that requires women to cover their faces.

CCTV does not prevent crime. Nor does facial recognition. 

Why do some human rights aware people object to their over-use? Because they can be used to detect crimes which do not exist at present.

Dextrous63

I suspect that human rights folk might be a tad concerned about what data might be made available in the public domain (or even might be sold to interested parties who might be interested in a person's day to day activities so as to target them with relevant goods and services that might interest them 🤷🏻�♂️).

FWIW, I couldn't care less who knows what I get up to, nor where I come and go.

klondike

Quote from: JBR on Today at 12:15:21 PMOrders from husbands: 'This is my possession and nobody will have the benefit of seeing it'.
A rather dubious benefit I suspect..

GrannyMac

Quote from: JBR on Today at 11:02:45 AMI agree that facial recognition is likely to be advantageous in crime prevention, especially as I see so many people on the news who are wearing face masks to hide their identity.
Muslim women, of course, might be encouraged not to cover their faces.  That is an ancient religious requirement and I'm sure that many of them only do so following orders from their husband (or even father).
It's not really religious, more cultural. I think face coverings should not be allowed in most scenarios, otherwise facial recognition won't treat everyone the same.
Its not how old you are, but how you are old. 💖

klondike

The main problem with facial recognition and faces being obscured I see is that it removes any potential protection that it is supposed to offer. I don't care if they take my pic to identify me in the least. I think I've still got some vivid masks  :grin:

muddy

I am innocence personified but my phone sometimes doesn't recognise me 😕

Flying Bomb

I don't see how it will work it seems to be well advertised that facial recognition is in an area so criminals will not enter that area.