Oh Dear !!

[Diasi]

He is a proven liar...
He was a great friend of Jeffrey Epstein and his side kick.. He even invited them 'Home'..
We are associated with the company we keep.. Epstein was a known/convicted paedophile ... Knowing this they were still friends..
Photographs prove that he knew the underage girl..
The law is an ass if they can not see this evidence in front of them.

What disturbs me most is the flagrant victim-shaming of the victim in this affair.

So what if she made a few quid, she could see Andrew walking away Scot-free if she didn't take a civil action against him.

[Scrumpy]

So she made a couple of bob by naming names ..!!
Andrew makes a few bob himself by using the same tactic..

[klondike]

If criminal prosecution was rejected it was because they thought the evidence wasn't strong enough to convict beyond reasonable doubt (assuming our colonial cousins criminal law is similar to ours). Barristers make a bloody fortune instilling a little doubt into the prosecution case. There is a big difference between having a photo taken standing with a young girl and getting snapped on the job. In any event she was 17 at the time which does not constitute paedophilia here.

I have little doubt that her version of events is probably true but that's it little doubt not zero doubt. With a clever barrister, and sure as hell he can afford a very clever barrister, that is a probable aquittal as only a few jury members need to have doubts.

So a civil suit was taken and he, probably wisely, settled without it going to trial which given the prior coverage could never have been very fair anyway. Did he get off light? Was he harshly treated? In my view neither. He should just slip away out of any limelight now for the sake of the monarchy he is part of.

[Raven]

Well at least he can't be blamed for the latest money he paid back, though some will. It was the fault of some Turkish Moneybag's advisor. Andrew just paid the money right back to stop anymore bad mouthing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60967996