Andrew

[muddy]

I m not wrong .
They may not have taxpayers money now but they have had it for decades .
Why on earth should the tax payer have paid for 24 hours protection for two absolutely useless young women who took umpteen holidays a year simply because they were born royal from these two grifters ?
If he was that concerned about his children he would have paid for them himself .
All this absurd protection issue ( the same with the Harkles ) is such nonsense .
We the taxpayers are not cash cows to be milked for a few spongers to live in luxury l

[GrannyMac]

I'm not anti royals, only anti some of them.  Andy could learn a lot about behaviour from his big sister! Her kids are Peter and Zara. The privilege money brings, but no royal titles.  

Harry's gone down the same route as Uncle Andy, insisting on titles for his kids.  Lots of similarities in their wives IMO. 

[Scrumpy]

Well said GrannyMac....

Some royals expect all the trappings and privileges that (Titles) bring but give nothing in return..

I feel sad for Charles.. He has always been second best to his over- indulged brother..
Always (hearing ,reading) how Andrew is Mummy's favourite . Also being told who he should be marrying..   
And now he is King.. and still his arrogant, spoiled brother is stealing the show .. Along with his 'Me, me me' son Harry..

[klondike]

I m not wrong .
They may not have taxpayers money now but they have had it for decades .
Why on earth should the tax payer have paid for 24 hours protection for two absolutely useless young women who took umpteen holidays a year simply because they were born royal from these two grifters ?
If he was that concerned about his children he would have paid for them himself .
All this absurd protection issue ( the same with the Harkles ) is such nonsense .
We the taxpayers are not cash cows to be milked for a few spongers to live in luxury l

My reply specifically said they get none now including the children unless they are out and about doing a bit of "Royaling" which neither Andy or Fergy do now or have for quite some time. Your post suggested to me that they all still get some. If it didn't then sorry.

[Alex]

At the moment they're still talking about him on GB News, reporting on King Charles' visit to Lichfield.

[Ruthio]

Good piece in today's i by the excellent Jennie Bond on the ghastly Andrew and Sarah

https://app.inews.co.uk/full_page_image/28-10-2025-page-13_55d507f8/content.html

[Dextrous63]

Woking or Dubai, eh?  

I'd have thought a couple of small huts on Little St James' island would suit their needs.  Well, more likely his, anyway.

[Mups]

I'm not anti royals, only anti some of them.  Andy could learn a lot about behaviour from his big sister! Her kids are Peter and Zara. The privilege money brings, but no royal titles. 

Harry's gone down the same route as Uncle Andy, insisting on titles for his kids.  Lots of similarities in their wives IMO.

Good post, GrannyMac.  

[Scrumpy]

Good piece in today's i by the excellent Jennie Bond on the ghastly Andrew and Sarah

https://app.inews.co.uk/full_page_image/28-10-2025-page-13_55d507f8/content.html

She has hit the nail on the head when she mentions his 'Inflated ego'..

[muddy]

He's out. .

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cnveqgj957dt