Quote from: Mups on Yesterday at 01:43:22 PMYes, I think that trying a third time would have been the answer, rather than sending her to hospital to be made better before they try again!This was probably the case of an incompetent doctor who couldn't find the vein so the euthanasia was going into the tissue instead of the bloodstream .
I have heard nothing about why the drug didn't even work after two attempts though.
Quote from: JBR on Yesterday at 06:55:07 PMAbsolutely. The Yanks may see hanging barbaric, but from what I know of the 'modern' British method of hanging, it results in immediate death by instantly removing any neural connection of the brain and the body, by snapping the top of the cervical vertebrae.I think it had to be a real expert like Pierrepoint who took great pains ( no pun intended ) to make sure his clients were dispatched humanely .
I suppose that if a person was hanged incorrectly, they could suffer a slow death by asphyxia.
Perhaps an expert might suggest that it would take a certain time for the person (correctly) hanged to actually realise that they have died?
Quote from: Alex on Yesterday at 08:50:18 PMI wonder what's changed ?Don't worry about it Alex. It's already been brought to my attention.
Quote from: Alex on Yesterday at 08:50:18 PMI wonder what's changed ?That's the burning question. Which brings us loosely back to topic.... burning at the stake. Doubtful that too many made a comeback after that.
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 11 queries.